Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last four months, you will have at least heard of ChatGPT. You probably also know that Google has rushed to compete with this exciting new technology and released its ChatGPT competitor, Bard. Bard isn’t out of Beta yet, and only a limited number of users in the US and UK have access to it right now. Fortunately, quite a bit is already known about the LaMDA model that powers Bard, so we have a reasonable idea of what to expect. In this article, I will explore and try to explain the key differences between GPT4 and LaMDA, the large language models (LLMs) that power ChatGPT and Bard, respectively. I give full credit to OpenAI for its assistance and co-authorship of some parts of this article!
Pre-Generative AI -vs- Generative AI
Probably the most striking difference between the two LLMs is how they produce (or generate) output.
Pre-generative models (more accurately called statistical language models) learn from a vast body of information and recognise patterns in how words usually appear together. For example, if the model knows that the word “roses” comes after the word “red” 80% of the time (I made that “fact” up, by the way), as in “red roses”, it will predict that “roses” should follow “red” in most cases, unless other factors come into play. Think of pre-generative models as a map that tells you how to get to a particular destination.
Generative models (more accurately called neural language models) analyse vast amounts of data to understand the underlying patterns and relationships between words and phrases. That enables them to generate contextually relevant responses. For example, if the model has learned that the phrase “sunny day” often leads to discussions about outdoor activities, it might generate a response like “It’s a great day for a walk or a picnic” when given the input “It’s a sunny day.” Consider generative models like cartographers, who can draw new paths and connections on a map based on the existing landscape and knowledge they’ve gained from their extensive exploration.
To sum up the differences between pre-generative and generative models, and sticking with the mapping theme I’ve used, pre-generative models are like a map that shows you how to get to a predefined destination, whilst generative models can tell you about the landscape and more nuanced information, such as the best way to walk, run or maybe ski across the terrain.
Architecture, Purpose & Output Generation
LaMDA and GPT-4 are both advanced AI models developed by Google and OpenAI, respectively. They differ significantly in terms of their architecture, purpose, and methods of generating outputs. Here’s a comparison of these two AI models:
Architecture
LaMDA: LaMDA, short for Language Model for Dialogue Applications, is a pre-generative AI model explicitly designed for open-domain conversations. It focuses on maintaining an open-ended, contextually appropriate dialogue with users. Although it has a robust natural language understanding capability, it is not primarily built for generating coherent and contextually rich content like GPT-4.
GPT-4: GPT-4, short for Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (the fourth iteration of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer), is a generative AI model specialising in generating human-like text based on its extensive training on diverse datasets. It employs transformer architecture to achieve state-of-the-art results in multiple natural language processing tasks like text generation, translation, summarisation, and more.
Purpose
LaMDA: The primary purpose of LaMDA is to enable seamless open-domain conversations between users and AI. It aims to provide more natural, context-aware, and relevant responses in a dialogue setting, making it a suitable candidate for applications like chatbots, virtual assistants, and customer support systems.
GPT-4: GPT-4’s primary purpose is to generate human-like text with a high degree of coherence and relevance. It excels in various natural language processing tasks, such as text generation, translation, summarisation, and question-answering. Its applications span multiple domains, including content creation, AI-based writing assistants, sentiment analysis, and conversational agents.
Output Generation
LaMDA: LaMDA’s output generation is focused on maintaining contextually appropriate dialogues with users. It strives to understand the user’s input and provide relevant responses while keeping the conversation flowing. However, its capabilities in generating coherent long-form content might not be as strong as GPT-4.
GPT-4: GPT-4 generates outputs based on the input context, known as a prompt. It can generate highly coherent, contextually rich content in various forms, such as paragraphs, stories, or even full-length articles. It also excels in other natural language tasks, demonstrating a broader range of capabilities than LaMDA.
In summary, LaMDA and GPT-4 are both powerful AI models, but they differ in their primary focus and applications. LaMDA is designed for open-domain conversations, making it suitable for chatbots and virtual assistants. GPT-4 is a generative model that excels in various natural language processing tasks, including text generation, translation, and summarisation. These differences make the two models suitable for different applications depending on the specific use case.
LaMDA -vs- GPT-4: Which is More Powerful?
As we’ve already seen LaMDA and GPT-4 have different strengths and focuses. LaMDA excels at engaging users in open-domain conversations, while GPT-4 is excellent at generating human-like text for various tasks.
Here are LaMDAs Key Strengths
Conversation-focused: LaMDA is explicitly designed for open-domain conversations, making it better at understanding user inputs and providing relevant, context-aware responses. This makes it better for chatbots, virtual assistants, and customer support systems.
Handling diverse topics: LaMDA is built to handle a wider variety of conversational topics, allowing it to engage users more naturally, even when discussing niche or unusual subjects. This can make interactions with LaMDA feel more like talking to a human.
Adaptability: LaMDA’s focus on open-ended conversations means it is better equipped to adapt to new or unexpected user inputs. This can lead to more engaging and dynamic interactions, even when users change topics or ask follow-up questions.
Here are GPT-4s Key Strengths
Versatility: GPT-4 is a more versatile model that can handle a wide range of natural language processing tasks, such as text generation, translation, summarisation, and question-answering.
Content Generation: GPT-4 excels at generating coherent, contextually rich content for various tasks, from creating paragraphs and stories to full-length articles.
Large-scale Training: GPT-4 is trained on a vast amount of data, which allows it to have a broader understanding of various topics and contexts.
Extensive Applications: GPT-4 has diverse applications, including content creation, AI-based writing assistants, sentiment analysis, conversational agents, and other natural language processing tasks.
Some Final Thoughts
In conclusion, the advancements in natural language processing, as exemplified by models like GPT-4 and LaMDA, have brought forth incredible capabilities in generating human-like text and engaging in open-domain conversations. While GPT-4 demonstrates versatility and excels in various language tasks, LaMDA specialises in maintaining contextually aware and fluid dialogues. These AI models have diverse applications, ranging from content creation and virtual assistants to sentiment analysis and customer support systems.
As this technology continues to evolve, we can expect even more sophisticated and powerful language models that will further revolutionise the way we interact with machines. The future of AI-driven communication is dammed exciting – and we’re only just beginning to scratch the surface of its potential.
This article was originally published on tonygavin.com
